Comparing apples and oranges ...
نویسندگان
چکیده
The most comprehensive and often-cited statistic about the U.S. economy is gross domestic product (GDP), the sum of all goods and services produced in the United States. Estimates of GDP are the featured statistics in the National Income and Product Accounts, the construction of which involves the collection and aggregation of an immense amount of data. In the construction of real GDP, complicated issues arise when adding up quantities of vastly different types of goods and services. These problems, which lie at the heart of national income accounting, can be thought of in simple terms as a problem of comparing apples and oranges. A Florida frost that raises orange prices might result in higher expenditures on oranges, even though the number of oranges produced has fallen. A period of inflation might increase total spending on both apples and oranges, even if quantities are unchanged. To convert total dollar sales (nominal GDP) into a measure of the total quantity of fruit (real GDP), price indexes are used to adjust for price changes both across goods and over time. But what if the quality of some goods is changing over time? Consider a particular variety of apples for which quality change has been evident: the products of Apple Computer Inc. The iMac produced in 2002 is a far cry from the Apple II computer of the late 1970s. More generally, the quality of computers—in terms of speed, data storage capacity, etc.— has advanced dramatically in recent years. Indeed, the celebrated Moore's Law, proposing that microchip capacity doubles every 18 months, has held true since at least the mid-1970s. In an environment where technological progress gives rise to improvement in the quality of goods, particularly high-tech goods like computers, accurate measurement of economic output requires that both quantity and quality be considered. To address this problem, the Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA) uses a technique known as hedonic regression to adjust sales of rapidly changing products like computers for improvements in quality.
منابع مشابه
Comparing apples and oranges: a randomised prospective study.
For many years the comparison of apples and oranges was thought to be impossible. Many authors use the analogy of the putative inability to compare apples and oranges as a means of scornfully reviewing the work of others. The titles of some recent publications 2 suggest an actual comparison of apples and oranges, but the authors do not, in fact, compare these two fruits. Our laboratory has been...
متن کاملComparing Apples to Oranges: Common Trends and Thresholds in Anthropogenic and Environmental Pressures across Multiple Marine Ecosystems
Citation: Tam JC, Link JS, Large SI, Andrews K, Friedland KD, Gove J, Hazen E, Holsman K, Karnauskas M, Samhouri JF, Shuford R, Tomilieri N and Zador S (2017) Comparing Apples to Oranges: Common Trends and Thresholds in Anthropogenic and Environmental Pressures across Multiple Marine Ecosystems. Front. Mar. Sci. 4:282. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2017.00282 Comparing Apples to Oranges: Common Trends and...
متن کاملComparing apples to oranges: just say no to N2O?
Submitted by admin on Mon, 09/08/2014 11:51am Title Comparing apples to oranges: just say no to N2O? Publication Type Journal Article Year of Publication 2013 Authors Vetter, TR, McGwin, G Journal Anesth Analg Volume 116 Issue 5 Pagination 959-61 Date Published 2013 May ISSN 1526-7598
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Critical care medicine
دوره 34 8 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2006